EcI> It appeared to us and to several other respected names (though hotly EcI> disputed by others) that some sort of over-SEOd filter had been applied to EcI> check if overt SEO had been done for that particular phrase. It was as if EcI> Google were checking to see if external links to the site included the EcI> phrase, on-page optimisation was being done for the phrase and even if the EcI> domain included the phrase. If the density of the optimisation, both on and EcI> off the page, appeared too artificial, then a filter was tripped and down EcI> went the page - solely for that phrase. EcI> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ EcI> Tohle je nejlogictejsi vysvetleni proc se nam propadla stranka EcI> house-values-cma.com z prvniho mista nekam totalne pryc. EcI> keyword na optimalizaci "house values" EcI> 1. keyword v domene EcI> 2. keyword v naproste vetsine inbound links EcI> 3. keyword na strankach Podle http://www.ranks.nl/tools/spider.html mate density na dve slova house values 17.86 procent. Coz je celkem dost uz pred Floridou. Co jsem tak cetl na anglickech forech tak pokud se klicova slova opakuji do peti procent tak se SERP vetsinou nemenilo. Vetsinou propadly hodne konkurencni oblasti, take z toho duvodu, ze kvuli velke konkurenci tam byla density doslova na hranici mezi SEO a spamem. Navic Gooogle zacal pouzivat odvozování slov (stemming), takze je mozne, ze jste to mel pred tim v pohode, ale ted se vam vaha klicovych slov mohla zvysit aniz jste to postrehl. Zkuste trochu ubrat a kdyz tak napiste jestli to pomohlo. Radim Smicka
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 02. 12. 2003, 01:32 CET