Re: nazev-clanku.html lepší než nazev-clanku ?

From: spaze <spaze-list (zavinac)>
Date: 30. 04. 2006, 22:42 CEST
Zdravim,

30. dubna 2006, 22:21:45, Radek Los napsal(a):
> Logicky z tvoreni webu bych delal verti HTML

W3C primo rika, ze v URL nemaji byt pripony souboru.
(http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI, What to leave out)

> protoze venovat cely adresar jednomu clanku?

Tahle debata je o soubor vs soubor.

-- 
spaze * everything that has a beginning has an end.
Received on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 22:42:09 +0200

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 30. 04. 2006, 22:41 CEST