Re: Duplicita

From: SEOchat.sk <seo (zavinac)>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:29:18 +0100
Ano, stat sa moze hocico... aj to, ze
web.com/2007-03-12/moja-navsteva-u-babicky
web.com/2007-05-16/moja-navsteva-u-babicky
budu mat rovnaky obsah. Ale preco by to tak malo byt?

Google nic duplicitou nevyhlasuje... vidis to prilis cierno-bielo.

Pri duplicitnych title-och je problemom usly zisk z toho, ze si zameral 
dvoma strankami tie iste klucove slova.
To, co si ty spomenul s tymi 2 3 4 ... situaciu nijak neriesi, takze 
nie, moja namietka je uplne ina.

Zdravim,
tybi

ehmo napsal(a):
> Ahojte,
> no, to ze to nevidis je sice pekne, ale stat sa to kludne moze.
> Samozrejme ze by sa to mohlo "osetrit" ale kludne si viem predstavit
> taku situaciu, par prikladov.
>
> web.com/2007-03-12/moja-navsteva-u-babicky
> web.com/2007-05-16/moja-navsteva-u-babicky
>
> je mi jasne ze budes namietat ze tam mozes dat 2 3 4 5 6, niekto to
> proste nemusi povazovat za prijemne. tzn ze title je samozrejme moja
> navsteva u babicky.
> a nemyslim ze by to google vyhlasil za duplicitu.
>
> ehmo [who cares?]
>
> SEOchat.sk wrote,
>   
>> Ano, je to duplicita title-ov :).
>>     
>
>   
>> Nevidim jediny rozumny dovod, preco by mali mat rovnaky title, ak maju
>> rozny obsah.
>> Vlastne nevidim dovod ani pre to, preco by mali mat hocake dve stranky
>> rovnaky title.
>>     
>
>   
>> tybi - http://blog.seochat.sk
>>     
>
>   
>> Michal Blaho napsal(a):
>>     
>>> Zdravim,
>>>
>>> je to pre Google duplicita ak maju 2 stranky rovnaky titulok,
>>> ale roznu URL a obsah?
>>>
>>> M.
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ NOD32 2665 (20071117) Information __________
>>>
>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
>
>   
Received on 04. 12. 2007, 10:29 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 04. 12. 2007, 10:29 CET